Not everyone carrying an axe is just a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on evenings out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t stick to these necessarily rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence occurred in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and movie websites that are streaming where people can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing down steam, the machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this was an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these specific machines. When working with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to try out the machines,’ said who owns the bar, whom chose probably wisely- to remain nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a lot of cash. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, this really is one worker whom keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a very peaceful man. He just wandered in extremely calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There were a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
The man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and possession of an offensive weapon as a result of his strangely calm yet violent outburst. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of these two tales is really a bit more frightening, while the axe was wielded maybe not during the slots, but at a person in the employees at a gambling store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ incident left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a state of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over their head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ employee with injury or worse if he didn’t comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime said that two men, both putting on ski masks, entered the bookie’s shop at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the assistant utilizing the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of money,’ plus the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the public that is local information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyhow? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
While every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has received its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight on the casino slated to be found in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposal that would put a casino in the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal option is regarding the concept that neighboring communities will be affected by casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos should be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, was one of a handful of prospects who have recommended that all of Boston should be able to vote on a casino that would be positioned in East Boston, as an example.
When it comes towards the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would register suit to stop the Everett casino based regarding the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal was voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said during a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed advantages.’
In line with the state laws that produced the chance of three new casinos in Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are required to negotiate payment, with arbitration needed in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t come to an answer on their own.
Conley has proposed going for a path that is not actually outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He could have the entire city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power on the entire vote. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston Globe survey unearthed that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question had been in favor of it, with just two coming away against it (with Conley and an added candidate not responding to the question). Meanwhile, four of ten applicants supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been in favor of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters return these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by their state since the site that is future of casino in the Boston area. Along with the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is also a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the increasing celebrity of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his or her own hand caught in the sports book cookie jar after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading recreations company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing members of the Conservative Party to call out of the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one of this largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the large numbers of betting outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting shops in the neighborhood roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘we know there is certainly concern that is huge some streets in our area are steadily filling up with gambling shops and pay day loan organizations that take advantage of our community, rather than help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says one thing in public areas and does another behind closed doors. Their hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very unusual for the politician.
Spared on a Technicality
Nevertheless, fighting back in the corner of the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna claimed that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a capacity that is personal and was accepted in respect with all the rules and properly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it can officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is no more a relative mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it’s a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or otherwise not the Conservative Party that are looking to ruin the publicity of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a difficult stance against the spread of the industry in his regional constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he certainly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is considered to be considered a future Labour Party leader, has experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this present year their office was accused of modifying their Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.